Sigh... Not ANOTHER set of controversial Miley Cyrus pics
Posted by heatworld on Tuesday 23 Jun 2009
Filed under: Miley Cyrus

It feels like the ridiculous hoo-ha surrounding Miley Cyrus’ controversial Vanity Fair pictures has only just died down, but now new pictures of the 16-year-old star have landed her in trouble again. Adam Shankman, the producer of Miley’s latest movie, has posted provocative pictures of the Disney star on his Twitter page. The pair can be seen posing together, while another shot shows Miley perched on a chair pouting at the camera. While the pictures might not seem too bad, we’re a touch grossed-out that 44-year-old Adam encouraged a 16-year-old to pose like this. But what do you think? Are people make a big old fuss about nothing?
heatworld disclaimer
The men in suits tell us we have to remind you: Bauer accepts no responsibility for any of the comments submitted below, or for any loss or damage caused by them. If you object to any comments please let us know by sending an appropriately worded e-mail to geek@heatworld.com and we will take whatever action we deem appropriate. Oooh!
abby67
No, you're wrong zodyack. There is an exception to the plural possessive rule for names that end in 's', in order to make reading aloud more accessible to the listener. When using a singular possessive against a name ending in 's', the speaker is...
zodyack
Oh and a good example of the correct use is in Bridget Jones's Diary, something surely 99% of Heatworld readers have seen :-)http://www.apostrophe.org.uk/
zodyack
Sorry but I'm right! People often think a name ending in s means that s' is right but it's wrong, I promise. The s' applies only to plural possessive, such as ladies' for one example. If you say it as Cyrus-iz (which you do) then it's Cyrus's. Fact
xgolddiggax
Looks like she's drunk to be fair. It is a bit creepy that a guy his age would get her to pose like that, but then again she does her own thing anyway so it could have been her.











