Skip to content

Celebrtiy airbrushing gallery

Posted by 26 December 2011 14:00

Fergie

Ahhh, don't you just love those impossible standards set by those airbrushes?

Well, it's time to scale back their evil work and show you what these celebrities looked like before they were stripped of nature.

Enjoy,

Heatgeek

Average rating: 4 stars (9 votes)

Where to go next

15 Comments

  • benbobalingdong

    02 January 2012 14:04

    George actually looked better before! and looking at Catrall its just AMAZING what they can do. I'm not saying they SHOULD do it, but in the 2nd one there isn't even a faint trace of where the lines were before!

    benbobalingdong

  • leighlee

    31 December 2011 13:02

    Still gorgeous! lol

    leighlee

  • poppycat1

    29 December 2011 18:39

    angela looks prettier its amazing what they can do!

    poppycat1

  • lustylimbs

    29 December 2011 12:31

    Haha, I typed 'lumoy' things. WTF? Ah, yes, I see what you mean. I am exactly the same, too much cellulite and not enough curves.

    lustylimbs

  • LittleMonster94

    28 December 2011 17:48

    I didn't mean that as insulting her - she is infinatly gorgeus. What I meant is, if you're going to gave beautiful curves you're going to have a bit of cellulite - I have the same thing! Just that I have a lot more cellulite and less curves :/

    LittleMonster94

  • lustylimbs

    28 December 2011 17:45

    I hardly think Kim Kardashian's picture is the worst! She looks fine even with 'lumoy thighs'. She's a very attractive woman. I think Angelina looks the most changed.

    lustylimbs

  • LittleMonster94

    28 December 2011 15:24

    Lumpy thighs are just the price you have to pay for gorgeus curves like Kim's. Adjusting the lighting on photos can get rid of it, no need to paint over and cut out like this. Just adjusting the contrast can do wonders for your looks, there's no need to take things this far.

    LittleMonster94

  • Saetana

    28 December 2011 07:06

    Other than the Kardashian bint (they took some of her horrible thighs away) none of them looked bad before the airbrushing, it seems like they use the shit all the time now regardless of whether its actually necessary, yeah use it to cover up unexpected zits or dark shadows (although makeup can do as much) but all this photoshopping is giving a totally false impression of what women in particular really look like. Look at Fergie, there was hardly any difference at all, why did they bother?

    Saetana

  • sumthinkindaooh

    27 December 2011 22:29

    i think they all looked better before. apart from kardashian. but we all knew how airbrushed she was when she stupidly stood next to her cardboard cut out at her perfume launch.

    sumthinkindaooh

  • spongeybob

    27 December 2011 18:29

    Angelina doesn,t look any different!Saw Kim unairbrushed before & it was shocking! Pasty & lumpy! Bleugh!

    spongeybob

Explore Heatworld

  • Celeb News

    All the hottest celebrity gossip, news and pictures from the around the world

  • Style

    Fashion, beauty and other things that look pretty

  • Entertainment

    All the latest movies, music and TV news and reviews

  • Club Heat

    Videos, pictures, games and other things to make you giggle

  • X Factor

    All the latest gossip from the hit show - X Factor!

  • Big Brother

    All the latest UK Big Brother and Celebrity Big Brother news